My immediate reactions:
- I was really surprised to see a checklist that hasn't been officially revised since 1991?
- Especially when it certainly seems to desperately need official revision, looking at the FIVE amendments to the instructions SCRAWLED IN BY HAND! I'm sorry, but that strikes me as *so* unprofessional...
- So is having the checklist refer to some forms as, let's say ABC-123, but when you look at the attachment, it's form XYZ-123. Can we have some quality check please?
*sigh*
... These hoops are made for jumping (thru), and that's just what I'll have to do ...
(with apologies to Nancy Sinatra!)
(UPDATE @ 7pm: I just realised that one of the forms attached is Rev Version x-x-84. Guess what the current version online is dated? y-y-04. OUTDATED BY TWENTY YEARS, PEOPLE! Hello, someone somewhere is NOT doing their job... this is making me *SO* irritated...)
Hi Lynne,
ReplyDeleteI really hope I get a current set of forms ...and not all these soooooo out-of-our-generation set that you got....:(
Soooo behind the times lah!
Peggy :-)